Monday, March 5, 2012

Patio Doors Evolution | Deck Improvements

Sliding patio doors, introduced over 50 years ago, provided home-owners with an inexpensive way to brighten living rooms and create an additional access to the garden.

Over the decades, improvements have been made to the thermal qualities, the types of glass used and the way the panels slide. Sliding patio doors can be constructed from soft or hard woods, metal, alloys and PVC. The final choice of material may depend on a number of factors, such as price and compatibility, and openings wider than 8ft may not be easily accommodated.

Because sliding panels need to be parked somewhere, the width of at least one panel restricted access. On a two-groove system, only one door width provided an opening gap on a two or three panel system, restricting accessibility by 50% or 76% of the aperture.

It was only comparatively recently that a new concept of hinging the panels to fold, concertina-style, in order to create more access.

Using stronger materials, a number of folding doors could open for nearer 100% access and be installed to fill apertures in excess of 6m (20ft).

More recently still, the sliding panel system has returned, reborn!

The latest innovation, introduced this summer, is for sliding doors to turn at the end of the runners and stack against the side walls, thus enabling access through almost the whole aperture.

Like the original sliding patio doors, the frames are narrow and made of metal. Unlike their predecessors, however, the materials used have been improved in many ways: powder-coated thermally broken aluminum frames are not prone to rust and are bad conductors (this is a good thing ? the hot or cold outside temperatures have little effect on the temperature of the frame); K-glass or similar virtually unbreakable glass is used and adheres to today?s strict insulation standards; finally, the sliding mechanisms are unrecognisable from the tongue-and-groove methods of years ago, therefore the doors slide smoothly without sticking.

Theoretically, there is virtually no limit to the width of an opening that can accommodate this style of sliding-stacking patio door.

The most popular colour choice for powder-coated frames is natural white but other popular colours are grey, sepia brown, green, blue, silver and bronze (the frames can be manufactured in any RAL colour).

It is also possible to opt for Venetian blinds to be encased inside the double-glazed units.

With the evolution of sliding-stacking doors, the humble patio doors have come of age.

Launched this month, SunSeeker Slimline doors are the innovative sliding-stacking patio doors available in the UK today, with very narrow frames of only 2 cm (less than 1?) of aluminium encasing the sides of the double-glazed unit for an almost uninterrupted view from house to garden when the doors are closed. They operate in an entirely different manner from SunSeeker Doors? classic bifolds ? rather than sliding and folding, each individual panel of SunSeeker Slimline doors slides and turns to stack at the edge of the opening. Both products facilitate access through almost the whole width of the aperture.

Related Patio Articles

Source: http://www.banisterdecks.com/2012/03/05/patio-doors-evolution/

news channel 5 nashville weather jason varitek andrew breitbart dead sheriff joe arpaio limbaugh aaron smith

Baby born with rare brain tumor faces chemotherapy | Kuwait Times

health21 Baby born with rare brain tumor faces chemotherapy

CHICAGO: Sue and Ben Erickson thought they were prepared after learning that their baby could be born with physical or mental disabilities. An ultrasound during the 36th week of pregnancy revealed an excess of cerebral fluid on the unborn infant?s brain, but the young Huntley couple quickly accepted that God must have a special plan. They were overjoyed when Matthew Donald Erickson emerged from the womb on Dec. 11 in seemingly great form at just over six pounds. He wriggled his arms and legs, grimaced and scored high on the newborn checklist to assess health. But what came next was unfathomable. Surgeons at Children?s Memorial Hospital, while removing fluid from the 4-day-old baby?s brain, discovered a large mass. A biopsy confirmed devastating news.

Matthew has cancer, they said. The Ericksons were stricken with fear. How, they wondered, can a baby be born with cancer? There was more. The baby suffers from an especially aggressive form of brain tumor, a high-grade glioma, most often diagnosed in adults, the doctors said. The cancer, whose causes are unknown, had already engulfed most of the right hemisphere of Matthew?s brain. Only about five children nationally are born with such a rare, usually fatal, condition each year, his doctors said. ?Why him?? said Sue Erickson, 33. Her eyes welled as she recalled her initial reaction. ?It?s just not fair.?

The doctors said they would understand if the couple took their baby home with hospice care, loved him and waited for the inevitable. But the team of specialists offered another option: chemotherapy, a toxic potion used to target and kill cancer cells that has shown mixed success with infants. The drug, to be delivered intravenously, offers no guarantees. It could, in fact, cause additional long-term damage, or even hasten Matthew?s demise. Ben, 34, blurted out the first question that came to his mind: ?Is Matthew dying? Was he born dying??

The oncologist replied no, that Matthew?s organs were functioning normally and, aside from the malignant tumor, he was healthy. ?That was a pivotal answer to me,? Ben said. ?If he?s not dying, let?s let him live. Let?s give him a shot.? Their baby had proved to be a fighter, after all, thriving after brain surgery. The couple rallied, found support from their families and friends and chose to view the daunting journey ahead as a blessing.

?We just looked at each other and said, ?If there?s any chance at all, we have to give it to him,?? Sue said. At 6 weeks old, Matthew weighed 8 pounds 15 ounces ? having never turned down a decent bottle of rice formula, his mother noted. He sported the equivalent of a baby comb-over, with wispy dark hair and eyes that lean toward blue, like his dad. The only obvious sign of his precarious health was a jagged scar on his head that his parents massage daily.

Regular baby
He yawns and makes small, precious noises familiar to parents but never wails or cries like a typical infant. Long before his birth, his parents followed a songwriter, Matt Hammitt, whose own child was born with heart defects. Little did they know that his song about that child, ?All of Me,? would become the thing that Sue said ?gets me through.? ?Afraid to love/ Something that could break/ Could I move on/ If you were torn away?/ And I?m so close to what I can?t control/ I can?t give you half my heart/ And pray He makes you whole.?

In 2009, Sue?s parents lost their jobs with an industrial cleaning service near Flint, Mich., and moved into the Ericksons? two-bedroom townhouse to help the couple with their growing family, which includes Matthew?s older siblings Nolan, now 3, and Sophia, 17 months. The arrangement turned out to be a godsend after Matthew?s diagnosis upended their lives. Louise and Bob Turner have helped bathe, feed and baby sit their grandchildren while juggling doctor appointments. Sue was able to continue work for a private investigative agency, and Ben returned to his teaching job at South Elgin High School.

The Turners completely support the couple?s decision, though are admittedly afraid. The day of the surgery, when doctors first spoke the word ?cancer,? family members sat together in shock. Then each wandered off separately, heading down different corridors in the hospital to cry privately, Louise said. ?I don?t know what chemo will do to Matthew,? said Louise, 53, affectionately called ?Nunny? by her grandchildren. Louise was diagnosed with breast cancer shortly after moving to Illinois and underwent radiation treatment. She knows her grandson faces a formidable challenge. While her daughter avoids looking to the Internet for information about Matthew?s cancer, Turner scours online medical sites, trying to balance her fear with her faith.

?One day, I got on my hands and knees and cried out to God saying, ?I don?t understand,?? she said, in a waiting room during a recent doctor?s appointment. ?I went to the hospital that day, and this peaceful feeling came over me. And then Matthew gave me this little smirky smile.? Louise watched Nolan and Sophia recently while pediatric surgeon Dr. Tord Alden met with Sue and Matthew in his Westchester office. Alden has been monitoring Matthew?s growth and measuring his head to check if the tumor has caused swelling.

The doctor pointed to grainy images of Matthew?s brain on a computer, before and after surgery. The white smudges that defined the monster in Matthew?s brain were impossible to reconcile with the squirming, cooing baby in Sue?s arms. Sue asked if the doctor could tell if there was ?good brain? beneath fluid and tumor. Alden said that he doesn?t know. ?We do have kids where we take out half of their brain for seizures, and a lot of that function moves over to the other side of the brain,? he said.

Rough situation
Sue was encouraged after hearing from the mother of another child who underwent chemotherapy at 10 days old and is now 4. Lauren Strickland of Naperville, Ill., e-mailed Sue to share her experience with her daughter, Paris, who was diagnosed with neuroblastoma at 9 days old and began chemotherapy the next day. Paris went on to have surgery, radiation, more chemotherapy and other treatments at Children?s Memorial and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, her mother said. Today, Paris undergoes brain scans every three months to make sure the cancer doesn?t return. She has some trouble with her walking gait but shows no sign of cognitive or verbal delays, Strickland said.

?Really, you have to accept there are some things you cannot control, as badly as you want to,? said Strickland. She advised the Ericksons to stay strong and not be afraid to search for other opinions. ?There is a light at the end of the tunnel, possibly,? said Strickland. ?It?s a rough situation.? Children also suffer fewer side effects, such as nausea, from the drug treatment, doctors say. ?When you hear cancer, you think, ?My baby?s going to die tomorrow,?? Sue said. ?You think of cancer as death. It was scary. But to know there are babies who have survived chemo ??

Nationally, fewer than 1 percent of all pediatric brain tumors are congenital, or present at birth. The reported incidence of congenital brain tumors is 1.1 to 3.4 per million live births, according to research. High-grade gliomas are not hereditary, and there are no known environmental causes for the disease. said Dr. Rishi Lulla, a pediatric neuro-oncologist at Children?s Memorial Hospital who is involved with Matthew?s care, reassured Sue and Ben that there was no way they could have prevented Matthew?s sickness. ?We really don?t know why this happened to him,? Lulla said. ?There?s nothing ever related to pregnancy, habits or anything associated with a congenital brain tumor. ? That is where I wanted to be the firmest with them, to make sure they understand that.?

Early on, Lulla and other specialists discussed Matthew?s diagnosis and reviewed his test results during a meeting of the hospital?s pediatric brain tumor board. Every week, about 30 oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, surgeons and palliative care professionals fill a conference room to compare notes and come up with a recommended course of treatment for their most complicated patients.
?Given that Matthew is quite small and the tumor is quite large, we believe a surgery would be harmful,? Lulla said.

Doctors were candid with Sue and Ben, telling them that, without taking any action, Matthew would die. Chemotherapy, when administered to children younger than 3 with a high-grade glioma, offers a 40 to 50 percent chance of survival for three years, Lulla said. After that? ?We really don?t know,? Lulla said. ?Our best attempts to predict have been wrong.? Matthew could face surgery in the future, or less likely, radiation therapy. Some tumors go away and never recur, Lulla said. The size of Matthew?s tumor and the potential side effects of chemotherapy present the biggest challenges, he said.

Support from all quarters
?We all agreed if Matthew was doing well, clinically, we would allow some time to pass so he could grow, develop an immune system and gain some weight,? Lulla said. ?We may at that point decide to begin chemotherapy or if everything is going stable, we may elect to wait another few months.? Dr. Lainie Friedman Ross, associate director for the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics at the University of Chicago, said that it is important for the medical team to give the family a choice of treatment or hospice ? because the prognosis is poor ? and support them no matter what they decide.

No one, no matter how medically astute, can predict with absolute certainty the outcome or child?s quality of life. ?There?s no right answer,? Ross said. ?It?s a really hard decision, and it?s not the science alone that tells us to do X or Y,? she said. ?We view this very much as a shared decision, to have the family and the physicians work together to define what is best. Regardless of one?s own preferences, it?s very important to support and not to abandon the family, whatever they decide.?

Support for the family has soared during Matthew?s short life. Louise started a Facebook page for him, which has drawn nearly 150,000 page views worldwide. Every few days, she posts new pictures or video, holding Matthew up to her computer for close-ups of his chubby cheeks. Students at South Elgin High, where Ben works, surprised the family in late January with a $5,000 check. They raised the money selling T-shirts that read ?Grey Matters,? on the front, with the Erickson family name on the back.

Sue and her mother broke into tears as hundreds of students filled the school?s foyer and lined the balcony. Ben, who teaches radio and TV broadcasting, was suddenly on the other side of the camera as his students recorded the event. ?Initially, I didn?t want to burden anybody with this problem. It?s dramatic. It?s heavy-duty,? Ben said later. He was overwhelmed by his students, family and friends, who began calling and texting over winter break and haven?t stopped. Then he realized, ?That?s what kind of kept me sane.?

The Ericksons have health insurance but aren?t yet sure what medical costs will be covered. They recently received an 18-page bill for $750,000, Sue said. As Matthew has gained weight and grown stronger, it has been easier for the couple to be more optimistic. But the reality looms. Their baby will have his next brain scan in late February, when chemotherapy will be considered. ?I can?t possibly give up on one of my kids,? Ben said. ?He?s just so strong.? ? MCT

?

Read by 140

?

Source: http://new.kuwaittimes.net/2012/03/04/baby-born-with-rare-brain-tumor-faces-chemotherapy/

storm in alaska storm in alaska asteroid eric johnson eric johnson russell pearce russell pearce

Sunday, March 4, 2012

PFT: Ex-coordinator apologizes for Saints bounty

G. WilliamswasGetty Images

Former Saints defensive coordinator Gregg Williams didn?t start his bounty system in New Orleans. It goes back to his days with the Redskins at the very least.

Mark Maske of the Washington Post has a detailed report that could submerge Williams in hotter water with the NFL. If that?s possible.

Four Redskins confirmed that a similar bouny system was in place in Washington to the one in New Orleans. Only one of the players was willing to be quoted on the record. Former defensive lineman Philip Daniels defended Williams, while also admitting what happened.

Daniels believed Williams started the program with money taken from players late for meetings or practices. Daniels said that former Redskin Sean Taylor made a lot of money in the system.

?I think it is wrong the way they?re trying to paint [Williams],? Daniels added. ?He never told us to go out there and break a guy?s neck or break a guy?s leg. It was all in the context of a good, hard football.?

The other players weren?t as generous in their assessment.

?You got compensated more for a kill shot than you did other hits,? said one former player.

One thought Williams took the system ?a little too far.?

?If you took the star player out, he?d hook you up a little bit,? another player admitted, while also defending Williams.

The most any Redskins player ever was paid in the system was believed to be around $8,000. Daniels said he got $1,500 for a four-sack game. (So what do you have to do for $8,000? Maim someone?)

?He actually had a saying, ?If you cut the snake?s head off, the body will die,? that was his motto,? said one unnamed player. ?It was made clear that he was talking about not just running backs who turned their heads the opposite way and how they would go down, but also about other stars on offense that were the best players on that team.?

This is all damning stuff, but probably not any more damning than the information the NFL has already obtained in the Saints investigation.

Still, it can?t help Williams? chances of avoiding a suspension of his own.

Source: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/02/gregg-williams-apologizes-for-terrible-mistake/related/

arkansas lsu storage wars storage wars millionaire matchmaker millionaire matchmaker shawshank redemption 3 10 to yuma

The Oscar Excavations: Best Movies I Saw 2009-2011: NIGHT OF ...

First, before I get into recommending the Spanish horror classic NIGHT OF THE SEAGULLS:

I've realised, since last I?entried this blog, that it behooves me, as a movie critic publishing without any editorial oversight or restraint,?to explain how I treat and deal with?"SPOILERS!" I understand that a lot of movie geeks who use the Internet to research movies, a lot of the people, that is to say, I expect to read this blog, someday, are deeply concerned with having movies' stories blown for them, by casually exposive (sic) reviews,?posted or published?by writers who don't know or don't care that in ignoring this issue,?they're doing real harm, in however limited a way. For instance, writer/director James Gunn probably didn't think the real harm was so limited, when it was his movie SUPER, a movie that depends in part upon an unexpected plot twist for?its positive effect on any audience, being spoiled by Roger Ebert, who may be?the most widely read movie critic on the planet;?Ebert not only spoiled that twist in his review, but did so flippantly, in the course of writing a largely negative review. There wasn't much?James could do about it, except complain on his Facebook page, and that's why this SPOILERS! issue really pisses people off: once the harm is done, it's done, and there's no way to undo it; there's no way to restore a story's element of surprise to a reader and/or viewer.

So here's the deal, with me, and SPOILERS! This is the deal you'll always get from me, as a writer, in this matter.

I can be, at times,?brutally careless about disclosing details of plot, but only?in discussing movies I've carefully judged to have no?chance of?surprising anyone, by way of anything scripted; I may be careless in disclosing story points, but only when I'm discussing movies that clearly don't depend, in any way,?on keeping those story points hidden, for their effect. Most movies don't set out to?offer plot-related surprises, for anyone over the age of twelve; it's almost universal, in fact, that screenwriting is thin in exactly this sense,?and that includes the scripts for?a lot of movies worth writing about. A lot of filmmakers believe that writing should be thin on story, in this exact sense; in fact, this?is one of the major ways in which big studio Hollywood, collectively,?is falling way, way behind these times, and today's audiences, and their expectations... but that's a subject far beyond the scope of this blog entry.

Back to the subject of SPOILERS! and this blog.?There are, of course, a lot of movies that are story driven in ways that require reviewers to exercise care, regarding what they reveal, in writing about them. Don't worry: being a studious movie geek, and having been a professional Hollywood screenwriter, myself, I?have an intimate working knowledge, of what kinds of stories, in what kinds of movies, require this kind of care.?I can't promise you that I won't give away?story points,?in discussing any specific movie; nor can I promise to let you know when I'm about to "SPOIL" something in such a way; but I do promise that?I'll always show excellent judgment, about what kinds of details comprise storytelling "secrets," so that any movie I happen to discuss, remains as enjoyable as it can possibly?be,?for those of?you who?haven't seen it yet. I seriously promise to do better than Ebert; that is to say,?as a movie critic, I will?be respectful, and attentive, in this matter,?when?writing about any?movies - even?when I'm writing about movies that I don't like or care about at all.

Luckily, today I'm still exploring my three years' "best" list, so that last point doesn't apply, to present company. (But earlier points do apply; that is to say, NIGHT OF THE SEAGULLS, for all its many and various strengths, does not have what you might call an unpredictable storyline...)

Another set of preliminary observations, to get out of the way, before recommending NIGHT OF THE SEAGULLS: when circumstances require me to try to explain my lifelong obsessive fascination for old fashioned, Gothic-esque, Halloween-y horror cinema, I'm more or less at a complete loss. Why do castles, spooky organ music, beautiful women in period costume and/or nude with fangs added, colorful unjustified lighting and wildly excessive machine-generated fog... etcetera, etcetera... why do these most elementary elements of generic genre horror, hold such overwhelming, enduring appeal, for me, or for anyone? Why is it that this is the cinematic stuff for which?some among us, myself included, live? I could work hard to explain it, but?I know from experience that if I do so, I will, most likely, mostly fail. It's easier for me to simply say, that's?just how?it is, with me, and folks like me, and?Gothic-toned "classic" horror movies; if you're one of the many, many?other?movie geeks out there, who don't quite agree with me, in terms of taste, in this matter, all I can really say, is, it's a shame you don't enjoy this stuff as much as I do.

If, however, you do agree with me, on this subject; if you are, like me, unhealthily entranced by just about anything one might accurately describe as Gothic horror, or classic horror, or old fashioned horror, this next movie on my three years' "best"?list is not unlikely to excite you, too. If you're not so susceptible to such cinema, not yet, anyway, maybe a good way to start yourself in that direction, if that's what you think you really want to do,?is?the old fashioned Gothic 1975?classic known in the States as NIGHT OF THE SEAGULLS.

Spanish?director Amando de Ossorio has a pretty good reputation,?among those?horror and Eurosleaze cinema fans serious enough to know his name at all;?most of the cult followings his movies have earned, have accrued to the several titles in his "blind dead" series. No, NIGHT OF THE SEAGULLS?is not the first of these slightly famous?Spanish zombie?movies, but?I think it's easily?the best. It certainly?has the most appeal for those?of you?who are not among the aforementioned serious horror and Eurosleaze cinema fans; that is to say, NIGHT OF THE SEAGULLS, as the strangeness of its title possibly?implies,?is, somewhat self-consciously, an?"art film," or something a lot like one.?I'd encourage anyone unfamiliar with these movies, to start with NIGHT OF THE SEAGULLS (and if you like this one, backtrack to see the earlier series entries); and though my own personal tastes make it hard for me to say so, for sure, I suspect this movie is good enough to be a good place to start, for anyone who's enough of a neophyte, to lack all points of reference, for understanding what is meant by "nineteen seventies Eurosleaze horror cinema." (Of course, most of the best places to start, are among the better known Italian genre classics; but my best lists draw only on movies I myself saw for the first time, in any given year, and I saw most of that Italian stuff, for the first time, many, many years ago.)

There is no narrative connection among Amando de Ossorio's "blind dead" movies; they do not share characters, nor does any strand of story run through?and connect them. What they do share, is their Knights Templar zombies, and even a glance at the stills available online will make it clear to you that these makeup creations?may be?the?most?frightful?and memorable?screen zombies in all horror cinema. These extremely slow-moving, ominously silent?zombies,?are dressed in Knights Templar costumes so weathered and tattered, you could?almost believe their putative age; they're so thoroughly and effectively redolent of all things ancient and dead, that even those jaded horror geeks who find the "blind dead"?movies too slow, quiet and restrained,?all around, usually?concede that their zombies, are, if nothing else, unforgettable.

NIGHT OF THE SEAGULLS has an unusually tasteful script for a seventies European zombie movie; the desire on the part of the filmmakers, to give this movie a timeless, "classic" feeling, is almost palpable. A young doctor on his way to his first post, accompanied by his nervous wife, arrives in?the tiny seaside fishing village that is to be their new home,?to find?they're not welcome and not wanted. The locals won't speak to them at all if they can help it, and won't even sell them groceries without telling them to?leave town?and mind their own business. The doctor being replaced flees without explaining the curse the town is under, beyond warning the new doctor that if he and his wife do stay, they must never go outside at night. Soon enough, the newcomers figure out that something strange is going on, something that causes the disappearances of young girls from the village, night after night - disappearances that are always preceded by the ominous clangor of churchbells, and the screech of weirdly nocturnal seagulls... and also, eerie slow-motion photography, of a troop of zombie cavalry, climbing from their graves, and riding out of their ruined castle, by moonlight...

The reason I mentioned the SPOILERS! business in this entry, is, of course, that this story is so thin, it's so old-fashioned, that it's hard to believe anything in it, is?capable of "surprising" anyone. That being said, it's a tasteful, thoughtful?script, that gives this movie all the excuse it needs, to pour on the style. The amazing locations clearly go back hundreds and hundreds of years; every shot in NIGHT OF THE SEAGULLS is crowded with decaying masonry of jawdropping age. The photography is astonishingly beautiful, dripping with opiated distortions, imagery often so fuzzy it's as textured as paint on canvas. Atmosphere and mood? NIGHT OF THE SEAGULLS is almost nothing but atmosphere and mood.

It's getting too late in the day, for me to fuss over giving this blog entry a rounded ending. I'll be blunt and brief: it's true it's a matter of peculiar personal taste, for me, with NIGHT OF THE SEAGULLS, and my passionate recommendation of it; for those of you who are generally disinclined to see this kind of thing, I guess I wouldn't recommend it,?so highly... but if you happen to have no set opinion of such things, as yet... if you happen to be Eurosleaze horror-curious, so to speak... NIGHT OF THE SEAGULLS is as good an introduction to the Spanish side of the field as you're likely to have easy access to.

Source: http://theoscarexcavations.blogspot.com/2012/03/best-movies-i-saw-2009-2011-night-of.html

barbara walters most fascinating person 2011 golden globe nominations los angeles clippers los angeles clippers charlize theron telenav telenav

Saturday, March 3, 2012

German court guns down third Samsung patent lawsuit, plus one from Apple

Mannheim judge Andreas Voss is nothing if not decisive. FOSSPatents reports he's just thrown out a third Samsung v. Apple patent lawsuit relating to use of the 3G/UMTS standard. Not to be one-sided, he's also rejected the first of two Apple v. Samsung cases involving slide-to-unlock patents. Weirdly, this latter decision appears to contradict a recent ruling by a Munich court that upheld a similar slide-to-unlock claim by Apple against Motorola, but Judge Voss and his trigger-finger aren't bothered. Keep it up old boy, and maybe we can have this whole thing nailed by the summer. Oh wait, no, both sides are expected to appeal.

German court guns down third Samsung patent lawsuit, plus one from Apple originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 05:20:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceFOSSPatents  | Email this | Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/judge-guns-down-samsung-and-apple-patent-lawsuits/

heaven is for real chapter 11 bankruptcy chapter 11 bankruptcy big ten acc challenge 2011 john wayne gacy amr jack del rio fired

Conservative activist Andrew Breitbart dead at 43 (Reuters)

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Reuters - Conservative activist Andrew Breitbart, an influential voice in U.S. Republican politics known for his attacks on liberals and Democrats, died unexpectedly of natural causes in Los Angeles early on Thursday, his family said. He was 43.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/celebrity/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20120301/people_nm/us_usa_politics_breitbart

salvia cybermonday deals cybermonday deals steve johnson norman reedus norman reedus sears

Friday, March 2, 2012